Verified agentic discovery and design

Improve thermofluid systems—with quantified uncertainty.

I help industrial R&D teams improve heat-transfer and multiphase-flow systems. Agentic scientific workflows combine open-source CFD, experiments, and Bayesian optimization; verification and uncertainty quantification show which improvements can be trusted.

Best-fit assignments

When a design decision needs more than another simulation.

Engagement model

A staged engagement, with evidence at every gate.

The first task is to define the decision and determine which evidence is actually needed—not to commit prematurely to a particular model or tool.

Technical scope

Focused work around the decision that needs stronger evidence.

Assignments can be diagnostic, collaborative, or delivery-oriented, depending on the maturity of the existing model and team.

01

Model development

Translate a thermofluid question into governing assumptions, measurable quantities, and a defensible simulation strategy.

02

Verification and validation

Expose numerical error, force imbalance, mesh sensitivity, and validity limits before they become product risk.

03

CFD + ML integration

Connect solvers, data systems, surrogate models, and heterogeneous compute without brittle file-based handoffs.

04

Bayesian optimization

Use uncertainty-aware search when simulations and experiments are too costly for brute-force exploration.

05

Research software, data & provenance

Connect numerical methods, data lineage, automated tests, reproducible workflows, and documentation so a team can inspect, extend, and validate every result.

06

Agentic scientific workflows

Use client-approved language models and agent systems to orchestrate numerical-method development, simulation, testing, documentation, and audit; accept results only through explicit V&V, provenance, reproducibility, and human-review gates.

Evidence today

Scientific depth with explicit boundaries.

Project governance: each engagement defines its operating envelope, contracting route, inputs, deliverables, acceptance criteria, schedule, background IP, ownership or licensing, data boundary, publication and reuse rights, and handover before implementation begins.

Commercial and data boundaries

Agree the operating rules before the workflow touches client material.

Technical ambition is useful only when confidentiality, ownership, tool access, and acceptance authority are explicit.

Contracting
The contracting party, scope, delivery capacity, and separation from university activity are confirmed before work begins.
Client data and code
Repository access, processing location, retention, confidentiality, and handover are agreed in writing.
AI tooling
Models, data routing, and tool permissions are disclosed and agreed. Confidential client material is not sent to an external AI service without explicit agreement.
Engineering authority
Model assumptions, acceptance criteria, and release decisions remain under human engineering review.

From first email to a defined project

Start with a design brief.

Describe the system, objective, constraints, operating envelope, available evidence, and desired timeframe at a level you are comfortable sharing. If technical details require protection, we can establish an NDA before the substantive exchange.

  1. Initial screenI check technical fit and whether a useful first step can be defined.
  2. Scoping conversationWe identify the smallest evidence package that could change the decision.
  3. Written project scopeContracting, confidentiality, IP, deliverables, acceptance criteria, schedule, and handover are made explicit before work begins.
Prepare the project email